First the usual graph of price changes, month by month, from January, 2000, to the present. We see only small changes from last month, with Los Angeles and San Diego having held value the best, San Francisco the worst. Portland and Seattle kind of squish together, just above San Francisco.
In the second chart we can see that Portland and Seattle have gone from having the worst price acceleration, here meaning ‘most downward’ in April through June of 2011, to being the strongest performers in November and December, 2011. In fact, the only city that hasn’t gotten some better is Los Angeles. That could be because it still retains the most of its price spike of the West Coast City. In fact, NYC and L.A. are almost exactly even in percent of price growth from 2000 to now; Washington D.C. is the strongest by some 20%.
The simple, and likely correct interpretation of these data is that the great real estate collapse that begin 2006/2007 is almost over. If you are looking for bargains, chances are you’ll not do better than now.
Prices in L.A. got pretty high before returning to earth — wherever, exactly, ground turns out to be. Below is the rate of change in the rate of change of prices. In other words, acceleration. Historic norms vary by metropolitan area, but generally range from about 2.5% to 3% in Portland & Seattle to better than 4% in San Diego and Los Angeles. None of the cities have acceleration of zero or above as of this past January, meaning prices were still going down. If what I am seeing and hearing is correct, that is changing with some alacrity.








