Condos in The Pearl

The Pearl has 74 condos for sale at this moment. The range is from a $140,000 short sale, which is a 432 square foot unit, to a fabulous 2,600 sq. ft., 3 bedroom home with a view, and what a view! This jewel is on the market at $1,395,000.

The averages — remember to use averages with a great deal of caution — are an average size of nearly 1,400 sq.ft., an average price of some $565,000 and an average price per square foot of $406.

As usual, homes with better views command higher prices. Parking is hard to come by in or near the city center, including The Pearl, so you should be willing to pay more for a unit with a deeded parking spot, preferably in an underground or adjacent parking structure. Buildings with a concierge service don’t necessarily command a higher price than electronic passkey buildings, but they do add a bit to the HOAs. A good concierge service is very nice. You won’t care whether you have it until you need it, but when you need it…

During the past six months, 104 condos have sold which implies there is currently slightly more than a four month supply, a reasonably tight market. Properly priced units have taken about 3½ months to sell, so if you find a unit that is properly priced and you love it, keep price dickering to a minimum, lest another buyer take “your” condo.

 

Considering a New Home in Forest Heights?

Detached single family residences, as they are termed by the appraisal industry, are lovely in Forest Heights. Homes currently on the market range widely in price, as do Forest Heights condos. The range is from $399,000 to a handsome $1,499,000. The average listing price of $688,000 converts to an average price per square foot of $186. As much as make-believe statisticians like to talk about average prices, averages are often misused, especially in real estate.

Forest Heights supports a wide range of views, no small consideration for buyers of up-scale to high end homes. The differences can send price per square foot up or down by 15% or more. The intent of the developers was that each house should be unique and that the variety should contribute to the charm of the neighborhood. Interiors and interior finishes also vary. Consequently, buyers often look at several houses before they find their new homes. Average cost per square foot is a good starting point, but a buyer will want to use an expert to help him or her evaluate the asking price.

Homes in Forest Park that have been correctly priced have remained on the market about three months if brought to market in the past six months. During the entire past year, not the strongest real estate market of the past several years, properly priced homes have taken about four months to sell. One lesson a buyer should take away from these numbers is that if he or she finds a home that is a good fit, and if the hired expert thinks the price is “right,” the best move is to offer at or very near the asking price.

A word of caution: do not think you can buy an appraisal from a mortgage appraiser, which is the same as saying from an appraiser who does large numbers of cheap appraisals to make his living, and come away with a meaningful opinion. Mortgage appraisers, who may charge only $400 for a private appraisal, focus on “How many appraisals per day can I do.” When I was appraising for court, the question was whether I could manage as many as two appraisals per week. When appearing on the witness stand, thoroughness and quality matter more than how many.

Good News & Bad News from the Fed

The good news for real estate is the Federal Reserve intends to keep interest rates at 0.25% at least through 2014. That means mortgage rates will stay low and might, maybe, even go a wee bit lower than their current 3.75% – 4.00% rates.

The bad news for real estate is this action was taken because the economy is not recovering as strongly as possible. Put differently, the economic indicators are positive, albeit not robust, but the Fed doesn’t really believe that jobs will be created at the rate the economy really needs.

A good piece on today’s Fed action is at the (conservative) Canadian Globe and Mail: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/interest-rates/fed-plans-ultra-low-rates-until-end-of-2014/article2314515/

Thinking about buying a condo in Forest Heights?

At the moment there are 15 condos/townhouses on the market in Forest Heights. About half are being sold by owners voluntarily; four are bank owned and four are short sales. If you are not familiar with short sales, the first words of advice I have are, “Put on your patient shoes.” Short sales generally take four to six months to complete. Bank owned properties are sold more quickly, and standard, owner initiated sales take only four or five weeks.

This is not the time and place to buy using average or median values as a guide post. The average price $262,000 and the median is $225,000. So, did you want to buy at the average price or the median? Your answer should be “maybe.”

The prices range from $160,000 (a short sale) to $549,000. Are these prices cheap at one-sixty and too dear at five forty nine? The answers require a bit of appraisal background, a bit of rehab experience and a practiced eye. And you’ll want to work with an Realtor who is more interested in protecting your interest than in selling you a house.

New Housing Starts Data

Today’s numbers were a little bearish for the economy but not so bearish for homeowners. New housing starts were down 18,000 units and the number of building permits pulled was down by 1,000. Those are nationwide, not Portland, not a subset of Portland. That’s not much to write home about, whether for better or worse.

If builders don’t build and the economy picks up — new claims for unemployment insurance were down 50,000 from a week ago, a large decline — then folks will buy the bank owned and nearly-in-foreclosure/short sale homes at attractive prices, and the “overhang” will disappear. Then builders will increase their outputs. If they buy American, the building industry will provide upwards of 50,000 new jobs not in building trades but in related things such as nail manufacturing and plywood/oriented strand board manufacturing, even in plumbing products. The increase in the cost of a house? One to two percent which is negligible, given how the real estate industry actually works.

If builders don’t build and the economy doesn’t pick up, we will see fewer houses on the market but not being bought. But there will be no jobs for the trades and no opportunity to buy American.

Historically, this is a very strange situation. America has shipped so much of its manufacturing capacity abroad that the building trades cannot lead the way out of the depression. Instead, they really need to see jobs created elsewhere so that their houses will be purchased. And they need to buy American. It would help if all purchasers of new homes insist on American made “board and nails” in the houses they buy, even though that will cost and extra $1,000 per $100,000 of value.

Why do I say Buying American will cost so little? Last time I did a cost analysis for a developer, I found that roughly 17% of the cost of a house is comprised of the cost of the materials, the board and nails. Labor is the largest cost, then land. Permits are not trivial, either, nor is the cost of selling a house.

Today’s final bit of economic news is good: the Consumer Price Index rose by 0.1% this past month which is ever so slightly more than 1.2% per year. That’s not going to scare the Fed into raising interest rates, nor should it provide an excuse for lenders to raise rates. Hooray! And small inflation is much safer than zero inflation because zero can easily slide to negative. Deflationary depressions are very, very difficult to fix. The last one we had led to World War II.

Is Your House an Investment?

That is a question that the economists hired by Wall Street Purveyors of Stocks and other less desirable creations like to answer in the negative. They compute an always entertaining average rental value, do a little dance, then tell you that your money is better placed in the stock market while you rent your house. Is that true for home owners here in NW Washington County, Area 150 on the RMLS?

Wall Street, or more properly those who time or try to time the stock market have one thing right: timing is important. If you bought the Dow Industrial Average (which is impossible) on January 1, 2006, then on December 31, 2011 your investment had grown by some 15% or 5% per year, simple interest. Had you purchased an “average house” (which is possible) at the same time, at the end of 2011 you would have lost 1%. Is it possible the Wall Street economists know something?

They know something, but it may not be what you hear them saying. Had you bought the Dow Industrials on the first day of the century, January 1, 2000, you would have realized a 12% total gain. Yep, that’s 3% less than buying five years later. You could have made more money by putting your money in the mattress for the first six years of the decade, then buying “the stock market.” How would you have done, had you bought a house in our area on the first day of the century? You would be ahead by a whopping 48%. That is better than 4% per year, again simple interest, during the worst housing disaster (brought to you by the same Wall Street Banks that own the brokerages that tell you not to buy real estate) since the 1930s. While the stock market also suffered from the same economic bad news, it managed a paltry 1.1% per year, simple interest.

There are also tax advantages to owning a house. And for those who like to think this way, if you bought your house with 10% down, your profits are in the vicinity of 350% to 400%. Why not 480%? Your monthly payments do not translate to tax savings on a dollar for dollar rate and your equity increase over the eleven years has decreased your leverage a bit. But even the smaller number stacks up pretty well against the 12% on Wall Street. And one might consider the benefit of living in your house — no small thing. How much does that add to your satisfaction with life? A great deal, I would hope.

First Data of 2012

Today’s data will be specific to the Portland Metro area. However, what is happening in Portland is likely to be a mirror of what is happening in Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles & San Diego. We just tend to be a half-step slower and a bit less volatile.

The first chart shows months of inventory going back to 2007. Months of inventory is defined by our local Multiple Listing Service as the number of active listings at the end of the month divided by the number of closed sales logged that month. Low numbers are bullish for housing prices and high numbers are bearish. BUT (isn’t there always a “But”?) keep your eye on the arithmetic: there are two ways to get low numbers. One can see an increase in demand, that is sales, which takes houses off the market faster than owners choose to put them on. Or, one can see owners decline to put houses on the market because the prices aren’t high enough or because the economy is too putrid for them to want to move — which are generally the same event.

How nice! We are nearly down to the lows of 2007 which were about 4 months of supply. This is not so bullish as one would hope: there were 1,700 new listings in December of 2011 compared to 1,925 in December of 2010, a drop of nearly 12%.  But wait! The number of sales pending increased from 1,210 in 2010 to 1,443 in 2011, a whopping 19%, while the number of sales closed increased from 1,462 to 1,612, a strong 10%. This is the sort of action we need to see to staunch the bleeding in prices. To complete the numerical mixed bag, prices were down a very bearish 5%, year over year, but time on the market decreased by 2.6%, which is bullish. The Case-Shiller numbers for December will appear in February, so then we will see the seasonally adjusted price series. Perhaps 2012 is the year the economy and the housing market (or is it the housing market, thus the economy?) turn up.

The biggest winners & losers, by MLS zone were:

West Side winners were Area 149, Northwest Washington County, losing 1.7% in value, and Area 147, Lake Oswego & West Linn, losing 1.4%.

West Side losers were Area 150, Beaverton & Aloha, losing 9.7% and Area 152, Hillsboro & Forest Grove, losing 9.2%.

On the East side, the winner Was Area 141, North Portland, losing only 3.6%. The hardest hit were Areas 143, SE Portland, losing 9.7%; 144, Gresham & Troutdale which lost 8.4%; and 146,Oregon City-Canby which lost 8.0%

Across the Columbia River is Vancouver/Clark County which is part of the Portland Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. Those numbers should be rolled into the Case-Shiller numbers, and if they are, tend to skew the results downward from the perspective of Portlanders. Those numbers are:

Number of new listings down 11%, in line with Portland’s; sales pending, up 7.6%; sales closed up 4.6%; and prices down 10.5%. As you can see, Clark County numbers are significantly weaker than Portland’s.

I am back for the new year; you can expect to see regular posts — at least twice weekly, though it seems unlikely that I will manage daily posts.

I hope all of you have a healthy, happy and prosperous 2012. Please touch me if you need real estate representation in the Portland Metro area. ron@rondavishomes.com.

2012: What to watch for, what to watch out for

What to watch for

I will be watching for the housing market to stabilize, perhaps even turn up. With that, I will be watching for joblessness to decline and for a substantial number of new jobs to be created in the US. Thus I look for the stock market to rise, but I expect increases in interest rates to remain muted as the Fed keeps pressure on and both Eurozone & Arab money looks for a safe haven, meaning US Treasury notes and bonds.

Abroad, I will be watching for Syria’s Assad to be removed from power. The Eurozone will find ways to work together more, both politically and financially. The Chinese renminbi will continue to rise, which may help address American balance of payment problems. Iranian leaders will continue to speak irrationally, to make threats which ultimately they can’t afford to back up. Chinese, Indian and Brazilian economies will continue to grow, though not at the pace of the last couple of years.

 

What to watch out for

American politics will find a way to derail the fragile economic recovery. To do so would benefit the Republicans at the expense of the majority of Americans. If this happens, the stock market will head down, exacerbated by the European recession. The crude oil market will remain high and likely go higher as US regulators continue to give a free pass to giant banks as they corner the market, “on behalf of their clients,” said clients being giant hedge funds in which the banks may well be invested.

Expect a recession in Europe. Watch out for it getting deeper and longer than the world’s economy can handle, dragging the fragile US economy into another recession. Really watch out for the slight chance that China, India and Brazil will be dragged into a serious recession, a.k.a. “depression.” If that happens, there will be social consequences in Europe and perhaps in the US.

Arab Spring will become Summer, bringing with it right wing theocracies in Egypt, Libya, Syria and, of course, Iraq. Expect increased attacks in Afghanistan as Pakistan’s military intelligence community, the ISI (inter-services intelligence, officially), increase funds and other support to the Taliban and any other anti-Indian group if can find. If the Iranian government chooses to believe its own rhetoric, look for a shooting war in the Straits of Hormuz, creating an opportunity for hedge funds to reap billions instead of millions from the crude oil market. Did I mention many hedge funds have extensive “investment” from the oil-producing states?

 

My Hope for 2012

I would prefer the “Watch for” conditions to the “Watch out for” situations. There is no possibility of a short term fix for the US and Eurozone economies. I hope that politicians of all stripes recognize this (not bloody likely, is it?) and even tell the voters that, since it took 40 years to export most of the middle class jobs and to reorient Western businesses to a “What’s good for the CEO is good for the Country” point of view, away from a business-centric model, it will take at least half that 40 years to recreate the 50 million jobs that can afford an upscale, 3,000 square foot home AND two cars, without two incomes.

I hope that Europe’s recession is shallow and brief; that the economic slowdowns in China, India and Brazil are temporary; that we, the 99%, are all a little better off at the end of 2012 than we were at the end of 2011.

 

Post-Christmas Case-Schiller

Today I have divided the Case-Schiller report into three segments: East Coast, West Coast and Non-Coastal. I am starting with the middle of the country.

The two things that leap from the chart are that Las Vegas and Tampa had major price bubbles, and that those unfortunate residents of Detroit desperately need a new industrial base to provide jobs with wages that will support the costs of home ownership. Cleveland also seems to be lacking in jobs that pay middle class wages and I suppose I can abuse the language by noting Las Vegas prices have fallen below those of 2000, proving sin doesn’t pay, or at least doesn’t pay a decent wage.

Tampa and Las Vegas prices are still falling noticeably, but other areas are trying to stabilize. Is the lesson here that Alan Greenspan could not have been more wrong when he said the government shouldn’t let air out of bubbles? Here the two biggest bubbles are the two with the greatest downward momentum.

 

On the East Coast we see similarities with respect to jobs. Atlanta home prices have fallen below their 2000 cost while D.C. prices have remained high and are now rising. As much as we might like to believe those prices are due exclusively to scumbag lobbyists and everyone else’s slimeball politicians, the truth is there are not enough lobbyists and politicians to pull prices up. There are jobs paying decent wages that allow workers to buy homes that cost 180%, on average, of what they cost in January, 2000. Boston and NYC also seem to have stabilized at well above costs of nearly twelve years ago. Miami, like Tampa, saw a large price bubble and still has downward price momentum. Evidently, Florida needs to find a source of good wages for a much larger portion of its population. If it doesn’t, we may see prices continue to fall for some time yet.

On the West Coast, the two price streams that are closest to stable are Portland and San Diego. Portland may have put in its bottom, and San Diego is falling slowest among the rest. Los Angeles prices are highest relative to their 2000 base at 164%; San Francisco prices lowest at 130%. Do not confuse the prices compared to 2000 prices with the prices compared between cities; Portland prices are the lowest on the West Coast even though on a relative basis they are better than both San Francisco and Seattle.

On the West Coast, the job issue is most clear. Only Portland lacks a deep water port, a fact which has resulted in it being the smallest and least prosperous of the major West Coast cities. The California cities fell much more sharply — from higher climbs — than did Portland and Seattle. Then they bounced, only to fall back again. It would not be surprising to see prices stabilize in all these communities within six months.

 

While prices across the country are still falling on average, DC, NYC and Boston housing prices seem to have bottomed and begun to climb. On the West Coast we see more vertical motion in California, which makes the situation unclear. The bottoms may well have be in the past in all West Coast cities except Seattle. The rest of the country is faring less well (or more poorly) than the Northeast and West Coast, but most cities are nibbling at stable real estate prices. I will continue to update the situation as time goes by.

Monthly Sales Numbers

I’ll start with the report of inventory. It is little changed from each of the prior eight months, as you’ll see on the chart below. This is the longest period of fewer than 10 months of inventory we have seen since things got ugly in January of 2008. This can be viewed as local supporting evidence to the notion that the market wants to make a bottom soon.

On the other hand, the average sales price for November was $259,400 compared to the year-to-date average of $263,400, which says prices are still declining. The median sales prices for the same two periods were $225,000 & $221,900. Yep, November’s median was higher than the year-to-date median. That implies that entry-level prices are firming. If entry-level prices solidify, then begin to rise, prices in the higher zones should be lifted.

But to dampen expectations for bidding-wars just a bit, note that last November’s median price was $233,000 and the average $271,900. That translates to a year-over-year drop of 3.4% in the median and 4.6% in the average, also suggesting entry level prices are nearing or have reached their floor levels.

The areas doing “least bad” were Lake Oswego/ West Linn with an annual price decline of 3.3% and N.W. Washington County with a decline of 3.7%. The areas feeling the most pain were Oregon City/Canby with an annual price decline of a painful 10.3% and Beaverton/Aloha with an even more painful drop of 11.6%.

Now the Inventory chart: